🔗 Share this article

I have some thoughts about the remarks delivered by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's win over Taylor Fritz in the US Open last eight. Consider – Fritz is the United States, the commentator is from the US – and sports frequently lend themselves to nationalism. A little bit of disappointment would have been understandable. Rather, Fowler invoked the continued drought of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone love a narrative, myself included. But come on. Even if Fritz defeated Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the next round, whom Fritz has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And had he somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, against whom Fritz had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also split the previous seven grand slams (plus Alcaraz went on to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). He said in post-match interviews following his defeat that he in fact preferred his path, because it presented the opportunity to beat the top three players in the sport back-to-back. He is well justified to aspire to the achievement; an athlete is meant to believe in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match who else sensibly had the lack of US winners on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

The American, 28, is placed number four in the global rankings entering the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has won his last six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. Presumably he might claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that is as high as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of ranking points away. His elite serve and powerful power on each forehand and backhand are sufficiently enough to dispose of the majority of rivals on the professional circuit. Against the handful of generational talents, however, he is frequently overmatched. The last several seasons has witnessed the interesting emergence of tall, gangly players who can nevertheless cover the court with the surprising quickness and grace of much shorter players. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His movement is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom win a rally that the opponent was controlling, and hitting a soft shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a quite harsh restriction on his upside.

The American has achieved a number of significant, improbable advancements throughout his career. Early on of the ten-year period, he was circling the lower end of the world's best thirty. Two years later, he was approaching the top 10. The previous season, he unexpectedly exploded to fourth place – and held the position. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and beating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a declining Serbian, is the toughest of all. What could the commentator have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing slump of US male players lifting grand slams when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the challenge too little.

The American star achieved a personal best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in July.

The American's performance in that exact last eight match should have been enough of an indication. The Serbian triumphed in four rounds, a win that only seemed tenuous for moments towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a couple match points and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The duo appeared evenly matched during the exchanges, with Fritz creating numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion rescued break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the brink of agony. When he eventually did convert a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a horrendous game to lose his own serve again; Djokovic had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the main contest and forced him to use excessive energy to win it. Down set points in the last game, his primary delivery floated to heaven. He extended the contest twice on his backup delivery, but finally double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, I didn’t think, just a consequence of needing to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The match was quite ironclad proof that the American is not good enough to beat any version of Djokovic, who lost to Alcaraz in the next round and did not especially appeared like he thought he could win. This is absolutely fine – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the peak of his physical powers anymore, but has developed enough experience and strategic intelligence to compensate for a significant portion of the decline. The problem is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was yet to accomplished anything that indicated he could.

The American is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in media sessions, more so than virtually anyone on the men's tour except for Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not just say his emotions or the strategy he felt decided a match, but clarify it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States not produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist feels unjust. (Since the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, maybe they can share that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably think about it indefinitely if I don’t accomplish it,” Fritz informed an interviewer in the summer of winning a major. I hope he realizes that he’s not a failure if he does not fulfill that objective, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying empire is actually extremely improbable for everybody else. {